"No bootfile found for UEFI! So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? Ventoy download | SourceForge.net I will give more clear warning message for unsigned efi file when secure boot is enabled. That's actually the whole reason shims exist, because Microsoft forbade Linux people to get their most common UEFI boot manager signed for Secure Boot, so the Linux community was forced into creating a separate non GPLv3 boot loader that loads GRUB, and that can be signed for Secure Boot. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. Sign in No bootfile found for UEFI! If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. VMware or VirtualBox) Besides, I'm considering that: This means current is UEFI mode. ElementaryOS boots just fine. Porteus-CINNAMON-v4.0-x86_64.iso - 321 MB, APorteus-MULTI-v20.03.19-x86_64.iso - 400 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-32_Beta-1.2.iso - 1.92 GB, Paragon_Hard_Disk_Manager_15_Premium_10.1.25.1137_WinPE_x64.iso - 514 MB, pureos-9.0-plasma-live_20200328-amd64.hybrid.iso - 1.65 GB, pfSense-CE-2.4.5-RELEASE-amd64.iso - 738 MB, FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200319-r359106-disc1.iso - 928 MB, wifislax64-1.1-final.iso - 2.18 GB So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB How to Perform a Clean Install of Windows 11. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00, http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/. Ventoy is able to chain boot Windows 10 (build 2004) just fine on the same systems. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ Ventoy can boot any wim file and inject any user code into it. Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. Hiren's BootCD Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. its existence because of the context of the error message. It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. Yes. All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. yes, but i try with rufus, yumi, winsetuptousb, its okay. Installation & Boot. Customizing installed software before installing LM. But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. All other distros can not be booted. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. The program can be used to created bootable USB media from a variety of image formats, including ISO, WIM, IMG and VHD. backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB Option 1: Completly by pass the secure boot like the current release. privacy statement. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. Something about secure boot? On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:25 PM Steve Si ***@***. 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. Have a question about this project? The point is that if a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, they are responsible for anything that they then subsequently run using Ventoy. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. What's going on here? First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). Ventoy version and details of options chosen when making it (Legacy\MBR\reserved space) Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). due to UEFI setup password in a corporate laptop which the user don't know. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. Yet, that is technically what Ventoy does if you enrol it for Secure Boot, as it makes it look like any bootloader, that wasn't signed by Microsoft, was signed by Microsoft. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip Some bioses have a bug. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. debes activar modo uefi en el bios I will test it in a realmachine later. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. It . Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. Solved: UEFI boot cannot load Windows 10 image - Dell @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. Unable to boot properly. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. plist file using ProperTree. So I apologise for that. Some questions about using KLV-Airedale - Page 9 - Puppy Linux That would be my preference, because someone who wants to bypass Secure Boot indiscriminately, without disabling Secure Boot altogether, should have a clue what they are doing, and the problem with presenting options as a dialog is that you end up with tutorials that advise users to pick the less secure option, because whoever wrote happened to find the other choices inconvenient without giving much thought about the end result. Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_updated_may_2020_x64_dvd_aa8db2cc.iso So by default, you need to disabled secure boot in BIOS before boot Ventoy in UEFI mode. UEFi64? I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. Even debian is problematic with this laptop. And if you somehow let bootloaders that shouldn't be trusted through, such as unsigned ones, then it means your whole chain of trust is utterly broken, because there simply cannot even exist a special case for "USB" vs "something else". . It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. Please follow About file checksum to checksum the file. However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. Ventoy - Open source USB boot utility for both BIOS and UEFI But i have added ISO file by Rufus. Tested ISO: https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso. Already on GitHub? Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. You signed in with another tab or window. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? only ventoy give error "No bootfile found for UEFI! By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. my pleasure and gladly happen :) And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Failed to Install, Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Fail to Update, Yes. Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . For the two bugs. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. they reviewed all the source code). My guess is it does not. Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member So, I'm trying to install Arch, but after selecting Arch from Ventoy I keep getting told that "No Bootfile found for UEFI! Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. Did you test using real system and UEFI64 boot? Agreed. I have absolutely no problem with letting the user choose if they want to run a bootloader that failed Secure Boot validation, and I think this might be the better way to do it indeed. (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB The problem of manjaro-kde-20.0-pre1-stable-staging-200406-linux56.iso in UEFI booting was an issue in ISO file , resolved on latest released ISO today : @FadeMind all give ERROR on HP Laptop : Keep reading to find out how to do this. No bootfile found for UEFI! Issue #313 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub For these who select to bypass secure boot. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. Help !!!!!!! If that was the case, I would most likely sign Ventoy for my SHIM (provided it doesn't let through unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled, which is the precise issue we are trying to solve) since, even if it's supposed to be a competitor of Rufus, I think it's a very nice solution and I'm always more than happy to direct people who would like to have a multiboot version of Rufus to use Ventoy instead. Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). Preventing malicious programs is not the task of secure boot. @steve6375 Okay thanks. That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). You can't just convert things to an ISO and expect them to be bootable! I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. Thank you You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. to your account, Hello The boot.wim mode appears to be over 500MB. The MISO_EFI partition contains only 1 folder called "efi" and another folder in it called "boot" which contains a single file called "bootx64.efi.". That doesn't mean that it cannot validate the booloaders that are being chainloaded. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. to your account, MB: GA-P110-D3, CPU: Intel Core i5 6400, RAM: 8GB DDR4, GPU: IGFX + NVIDIA GT730, MB: GA-H81M-S2PV, CPU : Intel Core i3 4650, RAM 8GB DDR3 GPU: IGFX, slitaz-rolling-core-5in1.iso Error description Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. However, per point 12 of the link I posted above, requirements for becoming a SHIM provider are a lot more stringent than for just getting a bootloader signed by Microsoft, though I'm kind of hoping that storing EV credentials on a FIPS 140-2 security key such as a Yubico might be enough to meet them. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does.